vexarian:
The idea that Jake is 100% heterosexual is in no way precious to me. It just happens to be a fucking fact.
It’s also not a fact that is in any way impacted by the Post-Scratch humans, this is because Jake, along with Jane, Roxy and Dirk were ALL CREATED IN THE PRE-SCRATCH UNIVERSE.
Even IF Humanity has undergone some sort of massive, cataclysmic upheaval in terms of their genetic, physiological and societal structure it would STILL be meaningless with relation to the kids because the kids WOULDN’T BE AFFECTED.
That’s really at the crux of the matter, I’ve been arguing that Dirk’s comments are likely only indicative toward Dirk and have minimal if any indication toward any grand changes in humanity.
This is because it’s the most conservative explanation and what Occam’s Razor tells us should be the correct one, barring new information.
However what you seem to think is equally if not more likely! is the idea that the Post Scratch Humans have experienced some sort of nigh cataclysmic alteration causing them to transition from a mainly heterosexual society into an almost exclusively bisexual society without any sort of sexual labeling and with related attitudes nearly indistinguishable from troll society.
This is bullshit.
And it’s bullshit because Sexuality IS NOT A CHOICE. For ANY of that to be true there has to be a mechanism to MAKE it true. And given that the Condesce wouldn’t be able to introduce some sort of grand campaign to simply encourage everyone to go bisexual that would mean individually altering if not every then humans and doing so in such a way as to affect all subsequent humans.
And if the Condesce has the resources to make deep biological alterations of this sort to a significant portion of humanity then her bullshit baking empire is utterly redundant.
The idea that humanity as a whole has adopted troll attitudes toward sexuality is bullshit, the idea that humanity has DEVELOPED troll attitudes toward sexuality is even more bullshit.
Even the idea that the only thing they’ve given up is the concept of labeling sexual orientations is bullshit, there’s no sane reason to give up the idea of labels if the concept still exists.
No, Gordon is just reaching because this is what he personally wants. I’ve noticed that about him, whenever he’s given the choice he always goes for the more “Socially Liberated”/”Social Justicey” option, even if it makes less sense.
Which is a shame really because he’s never struck me as that sort of dipshit.
Whoah, whoah, hold up there, you’re reading too far into this.
> GE: Take a couple days to write an essay clarifying your position.
First, Jake’s heterosexuality is not a fact. It’s a popular, plausible fanon theory which, a few days ago, seemed like it was probably correct, but it’s not canon. People used to think Rose was probably straight. People used to think Kanaya was probably straight. In these sorts of situations, I’d rather stay on the fence and try to give both sides a fair shake in case some new evidence (such as, say, Roxy and the Auto-Responder talking about Dirk like he’s a viable contender in the Jake English love tetrahedron) changes the context. Note how, earlier in this discussion, I argued that post-Scratch society not giving a fuck about sexual orientation torpedoes that whole “If Jake was straight, why wouldn’t he just tell Dirk to shoot him down?” argument.
However what you seem to think is equally if not more likely! is the idea that the Post Scratch Humans have experienced some sort of nigh cataclysmic alteration causing them to transition from a mainly heterosexual society into an almost exclusively bisexual society without any sort of sexual labeling and with related attitudes nearly indistinguishable from troll society.
This is bullshit.
Yes, it’s pretty unlikely, and I didn’t mean to imply that I agreed with that theory, I should’ve been clearer, I’m guessing that the first time I reblogged it, I probably declined to comment on that part because I disagreed with it, but it seemed more like idle musing than a well thought out, central part of the theory, and I didn’t want to get into an argument, and the second time, I probably just skimmed over the original post since I had already read it earlier and remembered the gist of it. I’m arguing for a gradual transition from a mainly heterosexual society which makes a big deal about sexual orientation to a mainly heterosexual society which doesn’t make a big deal about sexual orientation. I’m arguing that tweaks by the Condesce to make post-Scratch Earth more like home might’ve been enough to make attitudes toward sexuality change a generation or two earlier than they did IRL. In retrospect, “binormative naive” may have been a poor choice of words, I meant that, in a society which does not make a big deal about sexual orientation and does not constantly remind everyone that most people are straight, it’s plausible that someone who is bisexual could forget that most people aren’t.
Even the idea that the only thing they’ve given up is the concept of labeling sexual orientations is bullshit, there’s no sane reason to give up the idea of labels if the concept still exists.
I’m imagining something reminiscent of clumsy, tone-deaf nineties political correctness. My current headcanon is that the younger generation is averse to using sexual orientation terminology and uncomfortable talking about sexual orientation because they see making a big deal about sexual orientation as an uncool thing old people do, so they tend to avoid the topic when possible, and tend to prefer hinting to spelling it out. I imagine that attitudes like Anderson Cooper’s “none of your damn business” or James Franco’s “maybe I am, maybe I’m not” are more common and most younger people don’t see their sexual orientations as major parts of their identities. In another decade or two, they’d probably stop pretending the concept doesn’t exist and get over their label aversion, much like how people IRL got over tone-deaf nineties political correctness.
No, Gordon is just reaching because this is what he personally wants. I’ve noticed that about him, whenever he’s given the choice he always goes for the more “Socially Liberated”/”Social Justicey” option, even if it makes less sense.
For a member of my generation, I’m pretty liberal by Canadian standards, and probably fairly liberal even by Scandinavian standards. I also tend to be disgusted when people fighting for a good cause shoot themselves in the foot with anti-intellectualism, essentialist bullshit, divisive identity politics or bullying (or, worse yet, when people highjack a good cause to push bad policies). I’ve also got a grudge against censorship, bullying and conservative pundits. I’m fond of fiction which focuses on liberal societies with little or no real world style bigotry, such as Star Trek, Futurama or Caprica. I’m also fond of fiction which portrays dystopian societies which have problems different enough from real world problems that they don’t hit too close to home, such as Farscape, Babylon 5, Doctor Who or Sliders. Alternian society fits into both categories.
I tend to favour interpretations which I find interesting or amusing, and tend to dislike interpretations which I find depressing, implausible or boring. Love triangles, secret crushes and awkward romances are interesting and amusing. A post-Scratch Earth which is pretty much a Xerox of pre-Scratch Earth with BCCorp and the post-Scratch guardians shoehorned in is boring. A post-Scratch Earth in which BCCorp’s meddling has changed things for better and worse is interesting, even if there are only vague hints about the differences, such as the mention of a multiglobal empire. Jake and Dirk preferring dolls or smuppets to human romantic partners is funnier and more interesting than canon. The Helmsman as a skilled pilot and NCO with plenty of free time to read, play video games, watch movies, chat on the internet and fill his quadrants between painful FTL jumps is more interesting and less depressing than the Helmsman as the sci-fi equivalent of a heavily whipped Hollywood galley slave. Humans and trolls trying to make pale, ashen or caliginous relationships work is funnier and more interesting than sticking to human romance, and success is funnier and more interesting than failure.
I generally don’t become strongly invested in specific headcanons. Sometimes I’m fond of two or more mutually exclusive interpretations and go with whichever option’s funnier or more interesting in a given situation, or interpret something both ways because they’re both hilarious (Lol, what if Equius is deliberately messing with people? Lol, what if he’s completely oblivious to his own creepiness?). It’s currently part of my headcanon that the Condesce tweaked things on Earth to make it feel more like home. This means fighting against sexism and homophobia. But it could also mean that she torpedoed the Americans With Disabilities Act, supported imperialism, expanded the draft and packed the courts with entertaining celebrities with no legal backgrounds. Maybe America never pulled out of the Phillipines. Maybe it’s still legal to keep slaves as long as they aren’t American citizens. Maybe there are some really nasty stereotypes about people with lowblood eye colours like Dave and Dirk. Maybe BCCorp has dystopian offworld colonies. Maybe America’s involved in over a dozen colonial wars throughout the world.